tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6867130980866241997.post3355796900826420075..comments2024-02-23T12:43:19.330-06:00Comments on Jim Hibbett's Reflections: A REFORMATION OF LOVE? date unknown... a note to Edward FudgeJim Hibbetthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07014365160004632705noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6867130980866241997.post-1814002438087069682012-04-26T10:14:03.041-05:002012-04-26T10:14:03.041-05:00Hi Anonymous, I was not assuming the Septuagint is...Hi Anonymous, I was not assuming the Septuagint is inspired. The NT writers did not hesitate to quote it even when it was in error of translation from the Hebrew. So I too am referring to it as no less authoritative. This is hardly the main premise of the theme of this essay. I was just making a side comment about how the word translated 'love' in both Old and New Testaments has a wide range of meanings and one of them Eros has unfortunately been left out of the overall meaning for us folks today. Thanks for your interest. JimJim Hibbetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07014365160004632705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6867130980866241997.post-17967445546024855962011-12-24T17:27:31.754-06:002011-12-24T17:27:31.754-06:00To make the assumption that the Septuagint is insp...To make the assumption that the Septuagint is inspired is equivalent to assuming that the vulgate or the textus recepticus is inspired. <br />If your major premise is wrong, or your minor premise is wrong, your conclusion will also be wrong. If the blind lead the blind...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com